Art Interacted

 

REGENT COLLEGE

INDS 501: The Christian Imagination
Loren Wilkinson
by Stacey Gleddie
Anthology of Quotations

March 5, 2004

CONTENTS

Music and Cultural Context
Musicians as Servants
The Questions to Ask
The Purpose to Seek
The Art of Interpretation
The Need to Listen

The Tuning of the Strings
The Use of Silence
The Expression of Reality
The Limits We Work Within
The Joy Emerging
Bibliography


MUSIC AND CULTURAL CONTEXT
v "As long as there are people there will be music. The world they live in is a startlingly lovely, confusing, and warring place, and the music they make springs out of every conceivable circumstance, from political protest to childbirth to military conflict."

Harold Best's emphasis on cultural context is an idea that I have come to place a lot of weight on due to my personal experience in cross-cultural settings. A few years ago, I completed a program of Audio Engineering and was granted the opportunity to be involved in a recording project in Ethiopia. I worked on the recording of Christian Somali songs and during my time in Ethiopia, I also had the opportunity to be involved with an evangelical Ethiopian church that allowed me to speak to their choir and spend some time with their music as well.
Two neighbouring cultures, same faith, dramatically different music. I was astounded by the differences in the two types of music I was working with. Somali music is very simple, using one scale and focusing primarily on the words. Ethiopian music is incredibly complex, using over twenty scales. It was the thematic differences, however, which really caught my attention. The Somali music spoke primarily of perseverance in the face of persecution: a much needed theme in a militantly Muslim country where Christians face persecution on a daily basis. The evangelical Ethiopian music, however, carried a vastly different theme. Their music spoke most often of a breaking away from or tearing down of tradition: a theme that has grown out of the need for separation from the Ethiopian Orthodox church which has grown almost unrecognisable as a Christian faith.

The thematic differences in the Christian music of these two cultures led me to wonder what our own music says about the culture we live in and how we deal with it. Those who first came to North America spoke in their music of a great and wonderful God who could sustain them through difficult times. Then there was an up springing of choruses speaking of the love of God: perhaps in an attempt to bring God closer, a closeness that was missing from parents who struggled so hard for survival that they sometimes had little time for a full expression of love to their children. Now, there seems to be a longing for the awe of God to return. Perhaps I'm simply whistling in the dark, but it seems to me that perhaps we reveal more than we think we do in the music we use in our churches.

CONTENTS

MUSICIANS AS SERVANTS
v Each musician must come to experience the dignity, rightness, and eventual joy of putting things aside, of emptying oneself and taking the form of a servant. Such musicians must be able to move back and forth, gracefully, servingly, and willingly, from the symphony to the folk tune; back and forth without complaint, compromise, or snobbery, without the conceit that doing an oratorio is somehow more worthy or more deserving than doing a hymn tune."

Harold Best's suggestion that musicians must exist in a creative humility of service that values each musical form in an effort to serve and challenge the communities they serve in struck me as a very apt assessment of the way in which musicians should serve in the church. Too often church's are torn apart by the pride of musicians in conflict with the needs of a congregation, or even by the conflict that arises when different musicians place higher value on their own favourite expression of music.
It is important to acknowledge that worship originates from the worshiper, and is not defined by a certain type of music that takes place on a Sunday morning. Music is simply one expression of worship, which is continuous. As such, the music on a given Sunday cannot be expected to cause worship, it is a means of corporate expression. In this sense the music leader (notice the intentional absence of the phrase "worship leader") is absolved from responsibility for the worship of the congregation.
This being said, however, as a servant of the church, the music leader is still responsible for ministering to a specific community to the best of his or her ability. This includes an attempt to hear those in the congregation who are not in agreement, to attempt to understand the reason for their complaint, and to make any possible adjustments in order to serve that specific congregation in a way that is most effective for them. This is not an easy task, but I appreciate the strong stance that Harold Best takes in advocating this type of service.

CONTENTS

THE QUESTIONS TO ASK
v "One could wish that more church's would ask themselves these three simple questions before they create musical programs: How much and what kind(s) of music do we need? How much and what kind(s) do we simply want? By what biblical and theological principles do we make our choices?"

I found this statement of wishful thinking to be Harold Best's most stirring call to the use of music within the church. The distinction between music that is needed in a certain congregation and what is only wanted is essential. If we are responding only to "want", there will be major dispute within the congregation. If, however, the discussion is focused on what is actually needed for the congregation, the question becomes answerable in a unified manner.
Music is an established part of nearly every Christian worship service, yet there are few questions asked as to its reason for being there. To do music well in a church, we must at least make an attempt at answering not only Best's question: "By what biblical and theological principles do we make our choices?" but also the question of why. Why did God command music to be used in worship of Him? Why does God care about the arts? If we wrestle with these questions, perhaps we will come closer to the reality of true musical worship. If the question "why" is applied to everything we do in our services, not only will our focus be clearer, but we will be able to eliminate many things currently present in church music which are the result of personal choice rather than the desire to bring glory to God.

CONTENTS

THE PURPOSE TO SEEK
v "The union of music and function, as we have seen, can be traced all the way back into God's way of putting the creation together: everything that God makes has worth and everything that has worth functions. Putting it this way unites musical action with function with purpose. Thus it is proper to say that all musical choices should be purposefully and functionally appropriate, with excellence continually assumed."

This evaluation of the "why", the reasons for music within a church setting, is brought out even further by Harold Best as he discusses the need for both purpose and function within any given worshiping community. All too often music is seen as the dressing of a service, the icing on the cake, what we use to draw people in so that they have to sit and listen to the sermon. I actually heard a pastor say once: "well - we've got the band here to get them inside and then, once we've got them, we can hit them with the gospel". I have yet to find something in scripture to substantiate this point of view. It is not only devaluing to the people being spoken of, it is also a devaluing of the use of music in worship, bringing it down to the level of a simple tool. The arts are just now re-entering the foreground of Christian discussion, and much still needs to be examined to determine what the function of the varied arts are in a worship context, as well as the resulting issue of what is appropriate in light of the function. I'm excited to see this discussion evolve, and can't help but hope I can be a part of it on some level.

CONTENTS

THE ART OF INTERPRETATION
v "It is sometimes commented that when an art critic writes about a piece of art, she is simply offering the reader her particular fantasy of the work. But artists often grumble that the critics 'don't get' something or other about their art. To no avail, since the artist gives up control of the work's meaning once it is presented to the viewer, now privileged to bring his own thoughts and experience to the viewing process."

I found this quote by Lynn Aldrich very interesting. The arts are inherently personal. Most artists have a very close connection to their work, which is often a reflection of personal struggle, or thought. My own work is this way; if someone spread my songs out chronologically, they would form a map of my personal struggles of life and faith over time.
If, however, art is such a personal thing, what is the role of the viewer or listener in art? When I hear a song I interpret it through the grid of my own life, and so can come to identify with it almost as closely as with one that I've written myself. Yet, when I present my own songs I tend to shrink from the interpretations of others. I feel the need to explain my own interpretation in some vain hope that those listening will hear the same thing I do when I'm singing. How difficult it is for the artist to give up their work into the hands of others; yet how necessary. It is this very variety of interpretation that gives strength and longevity to art. Art remains current through the interpretations of those who are still interacting with it.

CONTENTS

THE NEED TO LISTEN
v "In such a culture, popular music has to be interpreted less as a concise medium with its own internal rules and more in relation to the other dimensions of the culture in which it is shaped. Such music does not have a separate meaning by itself, in isolation from its context. Rather the context makes the music possible and is integral to the meaning."


Graham Cray has a fascinating perspective on the role of popular music in spirituality. Popular music has often been denigrated by the church as "evil", or at least as "unholy". It is very easy as a Christian to focus so fully on not being of the world, that we forget that not only are we living in it, but we also have some measure of responsibility for it.
Granted, there must be a line drawn somewhere in the music that we listen to consistently, but popular music says much about the worries, joys and struggles of the world around us and should be valued as a tool of connection. Lyrics such as: "These are the days of miracle and wonder and don't cry baby, don't cry" (Paul Simon); "tell me I will never die unloved" (Jann Arden); "I've got it coming to me because I'm not satisfied, The hunger keeps on growing" (Dave Matthews); and "Beneath the dust and love and sweat that hangs on everybody, There's a dead man trying to get out" (Adam Duritz, Counting Crows) speak of the struggle, the longing, the reality of living in this world.
How can we hope to minister to a world that we know nothing of? Even entertainment-geared 'artists' such as Brittany Spears should not be ignored, because this is music that influences millions of people worldwide. No other artistic genre has such widespread impact as popular music, a fact that should not cause us to shrink away, but to sit up, and take notice in order to respond.

CONTENTS


THE TUNING OF THE STRINGS
v "God's involvement with our lives neither pushes us out, nor swallows us up, nor leads to some kind of fusion. God does something much more creative - through intimate interaction with us, he frees us to 'sound' as we were created to sound, enabling us to be more fully ourselves. We are not de-humanized, but re-humanized."


Jeremy Begbie's image of the Trinity as three notes played simultaneously is a stirring picture of the interaction and independence of the Trinity, as well as our involvement in the 'sounding'. I love the idea of God's interaction with us being to 'free us to sound'. It makes me think of tuning a guitar. When you get towards the last few strings, if you've done the tuning well, the other strings will hum as you approach the correct pitch. The resonance, being perfectly matched, causes one note to play the others. The same is true of choral and orchestral music. At certain points in the music, if the music is played well, the combination of pitches and timbres will cause a note to sound in harmony which is not written, or even being played by any instrument. It is a note that is created out of the combined effort of all. I think Begbie's illustration holds true even to this level. If we are freed to sound, and do it well, then we in turn are able to free others to sound, and to produce new things in our combined sounding with the Trinity.

CONTENTS


THE USE OF SILENCE
v "Since words are his chief instrument, words are what he chiefly has to use but remembering always that the silence that his words frame - the silence that his words are born out of and that his words break and that his words are swallowed up by - may well convey the mystery of truth better than the words themselves can just as the empty space inside a church may well convey better than all the art and architecture of a church the mystery of that in which we live and move and have our being. We put frames of words around silence and shells of stone and wood around emptiness, but it is the silence, the emptiness themselves, that finally matter and out of which the Gospel comes as word."


Buechner's description of the importance of the silence before a preacher begins to speak is profound. We live in a world that is uncomfortable with, even afraid of silence, absence of any kind. We are constantly bombarded with colour, with shapes, with sounds, with things to hear and see and feel. Perhaps the value of art and creativity lies partly in the ability to speak out of and into silence, to mould silence in such a way as to make silence speak again.
It sounds contradictory, perhaps it is, but it seems to me that some of the most powerful art uses silence or absence in a profound way. This is most evident to me in music, specifically in classical music. The tension of a single note suspended supersedes the weight of a waterfall of pitches that came before. I learned this from my piano teacher when I was in high school. With youthful impatience I wanted her to give me, her most advanced student, the most difficult pieces to play. I wanted the fast and the furious, the cascade of notes that would overwhelm my listeners' ears as they gazed in amazement at the effortless flow of my fingers across the keys. Instead she gave me Chopin. She gave me pieces with gigantic holes in them that I wanted to fill with trills and arpeggios. She played me a recording of one of her favourite pianists playing the piece she wanted me to learn, and I listened in awe to the power of silence. "That's what I want you to learn" she said. So I tried to learn the value of silence and space. I still think of this as the mark of a very good musician - the ability to handle silence well. I think it is this Buechner speaks of when he describes so eloquently the truth inherent in silence. I think perhaps this silent truth exists because it was into this silence that God spoke, and out of nothing that God brought something. This is the mystery. This is the truth.

CONTENTS

THE EXPRESSION OF REALITY
v "If [the preacher] does not make real to them the human experience of what it is to cry into the storm and receive no answer, to be sick at heart and find no healing, then he becomes the only one there who seems not to have had that experience because most surely under their bonnets and shawls and jackets, under their afros and ponytails, all the others there have had it whether they talk of it or not. As much as anything else, it is their experience of the absence of God that has brought them there in search of his presence and if the preacher does not speak of that and to that, then he becomes like the captain of a ship who is the only one aboard who either does not know that the waves are twenty feet high and the decks awash or will not face up to it so that anything else he tries to say by way of hope and comfort and empowering becomes suspect on the basis of that one crucial ignorance or disingenuousness or cowardice or reluctance to speak in love any truths but the ones that people love to hear."


The gospel as tragedy: this is a topic that few care to take up in the evangelical world that produced "The Happy Song" as one of the commonly used choruses in corporate worship music. The gospel as tragedy, the admission of the work as done . . . . and not done: this is a real faith. Perhaps here the majority of art has remained faithful.
I am inclined to believe, however, that corporate worship music has failed in this area. During Iain Provan's Old Testament class, I nodded furiously through his tirade on the lack of lament used in churches. It's something that I have felt deeply for quite some time. I went through a time of depression a few years ago. I've never made so many excuses not to go to church. The last place I wanted to be was in the middle of a crowd of apparently happy people, expressing happy emotions. I felt that, in the state of emotion I was in, there was no place for me at church. Corporate worship music is at least in part a communal expression of emotion, yet we stubbornly refuse to acknowledge any type of negative emotion. If we can't acknowledge corporately that all is not right with the world, with our worlds, then we invalidate anyone who may be experiencing a reality that goes against the nice picture we paint every Sunday morning.

CONTENTS

THE LIMITS WE WORK WITHIN
v "The components of the material world are fixed; those of the world of imagination increase by a continuous and irreversible process, without any destruction or rearrangement of what went before. This represents the nearest approach we experience to "creation out of nothing," and we conceive of the act of absolute creation as being an act analogous to that of the creative artist."

This quote struck me in a rather strange way. Often I have wondered about the number of songs in the world. Sometimes I'm almost convinced that the songs I write must have been produced at some time in some distant past; it's an uncanny feeling of repetition. There are a limited number of notes that can be played or sung, a limited number of instruments to play them on, a limited number of words that can be used, and languages to speak them in. Considering that I write approximately twenty songs in a year, and there are numerous songwriters worldwide writing as many or more songs per year, there must be a point at which everything runs out. The limits of matter are the confines within which we work.
But this limited matter was created by a limitless God, and perhaps that is the point. A God that can create limitlessly out of nothing gave us these limits within which to operate. And what would be narrow limits indeed if they could be placed around a limitless God, may be endless to those who are a part of those very limits. The ring that He has drawn around us, limiting us to this sphere of matter, is perhaps large enough. Large enough for now. Perhaps my uncanny feeling of repetition is the shadow of a time to come when I will be granted the right to outgrow these magnificent limits.

CONTENTS

THE JOY EMERGING
For many years I shied away from Christian music, from Christian art as a whole, finding much of the current Christian art to be kitschy and somewhat cliché. Today, however, I feel as if the Christians of the world are waking up to the world of art again. I realise that this sounds arrogant, but I write with the knowledge that my own art has also been through this journey from kitsch to the beginning of competency, a competency that has already progressed to excellence for many great Christian artists.
The reading I did for this assignment brought me the joyful realisation that the depth of theological thought on art is resurfacing. It began before I noticed, and I feel like it's starting to seep into the minds and hearts of Christian artists opening them to the joy of not having to paint another Easter lily in the same neutral colours, of not having to write using the same tired images in the same tired ways. Christian artists are waking up to realise that they do indeed have a voice, and a place, and they can indeed use their talent well within their faith to the glory of God, and to the edification of us all.

CONTENTS

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aldrich, Lynn. "Through Sculpture: What's the Matter with Matter?" In Beholding the Glory: Incarnation Through the Arts, Jeremy Begbie ed., 98-117. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2003.

Begbie, Jeremy. "Through Music: Sound Mix." In Beholding the Glory: Incarnation Through the Arts, Jeremy Begbie ed., 138-154. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2003.

Best, Harold M. Music Through the Eyes of Faith. San Francisco: Harper Collins Publishers, 1993.

Buechner, Frederick. Telling the Truth: The Gospel as Tragedy, Comedy & Fairy Tale. San Francisco: Harper Collins Publishing, 1977.

Cray, Graham. "Through Popular Music: 'Wholy Holy?'" In Beholding the Glory: Incarnation Through the Arts, Jeremy Begbie ed., 118-137. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2003.

Sayers, Dorothy. The Mind of the Maker. New York: Mendian Books, 1956.

Great Commission Worship & Arts Center

GCWAC@DiscipleTheNations.org

CONTENTS

HOME